Quantcast
Channel: RAM | STAAD | ADINA Wiki
Viewing all 8748 articles
Browse latest View live

RAM Concept Licensing and Usage of Post Tension (PT) Features

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Seth Guthrie on 8/23/2016 7:09:51 PM

 Applies To 
 Product(s):RAM Concept
 Version(s):All
 Environment: N/A
 Area: Licensing
 Original Author:Bentley Technical Support Group

What Ram Concept features trigger usage of the Ram Concept Post Tension Module license?

In RAM Concept release 5.0.2 and earlier, both a "RAM Concept" (product #1477) usage and a "RAM Concept Post Tension Module" (product #1479)usage are incurred each time the program is opened. The RAM Concept Post Tension Module (1479) license is tracked even if the model does not contain tendons and no tendon tools were used while the program was open.

Starting with Ram Concept release 5.1 and later, opening the program, opening a file, and performing the calculation in Ram Concept only ever requires a license for "Ram Concept" (1477). In those versions, a "RAM Concept Post Tension Module" (1479) usage is only incurred when specific tools for tendon modeling are used. 

To avoid unwanted "RAM Concept Post Tension Module" (1479) usage, it is important to update to a recent release of the program.

The tools and features that require a "RAM Concept Post Tension Module" (1479) and incur usage in the current version of the program are listed in the table below:

Layer or menuTools
Tendon Parameters (layer)
Manual Tendons (layer)
Process (menu)

Once usage of the PT features is initiated, that usage will continue in parallel with the Ram Concept (1477) usage until the end of that session. 

Starting with the CONNECT edition of Ram Concept (version 6.0), an option under Help - Manage License Restrictions was added so that users can opt out of all PT features in advance, like a safety.

If this option is unchecked, then whenever the post-tensioning features mentioned above are selected, the user will have to acknowledge and accept that usage or cancel.

See Also

Structural Products Licensing [FAQ]

How products that use the Bentley IEG License Service are licensed

Structural Product TechNotes And FAQs

Tags: RAM Concept, Usage, SELECTsupport, licensing

How do I download/configure SectionWizard

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Payel on 8/24/2016 6:28:47 PM

  
 Applies To 
  
 Product(s):STAAD.Pro
 Version(s):V8i (20.07.09.XX) and later
 Environment: N/A
 Area: STAAD.Pro Installation/Licensing Solutions
 Subarea: Installation/Licensing
 Original Author:Payel Sasmal, Bentley Technical Support Group
  

How do I download/install SectionWizard? I do not see it in the Software Fulfillment center.

There is no separate installation for SectionWizard. It is installed along with STAAD.Pro. No license configuration is needed to run this module.

Please make sure that SectionWizard is launched from the STAAD.Pro menu as illustrated here. This is a free module provided for STAAD.Pro users.

P.S. In case you have a standalone version of Sectionwizard installed in your machine, do not access it from there. It will record a separate usage of SectionWizard license which may raise some invoice. 

Tags: section wizard, SectionWizard

(08.02.2016) Bentley Success Factors Webinar: Accuracy, Precision, and Practicality in Structural Analysis

$
0
0
Revision 1 posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Allen Adams on 8/25/2016 6:08:57 PM

In August 2016, Bentley hosted a Bentley Success Factors webinar titled Accuracy, Precision, and Practicality in Structural Analysis. A recording of that webinar can be found at: http://pages.info.bentley.com/video-details/?video=CO_VID_RAMWEB_01_16&videoDBID=87cef95b-4d08-4dde-93ba-cf271ec0b2a7

 

During that webinar several questions were received. Time did not permit answering all of the questions nor of providing detailed answers. Compiled here are the questions that were received, with more thorough answers.

 

Technical

Q: Is it possible to have a leaning column in concrete construction?

A: Yes, it is. Gravity columns (those designed only for gravity loads) are often smaller than Frame columns, or have less reinforcement and are more prone to cracking in a seismic or wind event. In either case these columns are not as stiff as Frame columns, and in a seismic or wind event they will maintain their stability by ‘leaning’ on the Frame columns.

 

Q: Regarding the comparison of models with different diaphragm mesh sizes, how did the stresses in the diaphragms compare?

A: In the study comparing models with varying diaphragm mesh sizes only the frame story shears were compared. The diaphragm stresses were not compared.

 

Q: Do you have to use the same mesh size throughout, or you can specify different size from one area to another?

A: In the RAM Structural System there is currently no way to specify different maximum mesh sizes for different areas. This is a practical approach, since it is generally not necessary to have a refined mesh when analyzing a structure with semirigid diaphragms, when the purpose of such analysis is to determine the impact of the diaphragm on the distribution of story forces to the frames. As was indicated in the webinar, the differences in results between a very coarse mesh and a very fine mesh are very small, so the effort that would be required to refine the mesh in certain areas would not generally be warranted.

 

Q: In which documentation can I see the list of 188 load cases to which you referred?

A: Consider Dead, Live, and Roof. AISC 360 requires notional loads, in both axis, for a total of six cases. For seismic loads ASCE 7 requires plus- and minus eccentric cases for accidental torsion in both axis (for a total of four cases); see ASCE 7-10 Section 12.8.4.1. For wind load cases ASCE 7 requires twelve load cases (various configurations of X, Y, and rotational wind loads); see ASCE 7-10 Figure 27.4-8. ASCE 7-10 Section 2.3.2 then gives seven basic strength design load combinations by which all of the previously listed load case must be combined. This results in 188 load combinations that need to be investigated.

 

Q: Are there any efforts being made to combine Response Spectra Analysis and P-delta within the analysis itself other than the non-linear time history analysis as an alternative?

A: As was discussed in the webinar the P-delta analysis based on the Geometric Stiffness method, which is used in RAM Frame and some other software, is compatible with a Response Spectra Analysis, and can be done jointly in the same analysis. However, the iterative method of P-delta is not compatible with Response Spectra Analysis; they can’t be done together in the same analysis. In that case your Response Spectra Analysis does not comply with the requirements of the Code to consider P-delta. I am not aware of any efforts to come up with a methodology in which a RSA and an iterative P-delta analysis can be performed in the same analysis; I don’t think it is possible.

 

RAM Structural System and STAAD

Q: Which is better, STAAD or RAM?

A: Both programs have their strengths, so it depends on what is being analyzed and designed. The RAM Structural System is specifically for building structures. This allows for faster modeling and more specialized analysis, design, and reporting. Generally the RAM Structural System is preferred for buildings. STAAD has a wider selection of building codes, some of which aren’t available in the RAM Structural System. It is also general purpose, suitable for any structure, building, plant, tank or frame of virtually any configuration. With the Structural Enterprise License, a bundled license of STAAD and the RAM line of products, you can have both:

 

https://www.bentley.com/en/products/product-line/structural-analysis-software/structural-enterprise

 

https://www.bentley.com/~/asset/14/2716.ashx

 

 

Q: Can we use STAAD in analyzing and designing multi-story buildings, both steel and concrete structure? What is the limitation of STAAD?

A: STAAD can certainly be used for analyzing and designing multi-story structures. STAAD is a general purpose program, permitting the modeling of any type of building, structure, or assembly, in virtually any material. It has extensive implementation of a large number of national and international standards and codes. Because it is a general purpose program it has great versatility in accommodating any configuration of geometry, loading or analysis. RAM Structural System is special purpose software specifically for buildings, so when designing and analyzing building structures it has some advantages over STAAD in speed of modeling and the comprehensiveness in the implementation of building code requirements for buildings. But STAAD is more versatile in the modeling of complex geometries and has a greater selection of international building code and material specifications.

 

Q: Can we import a model from STAAD to RAM Structural System?

A: Yes, models can be imported and exported between those two programs and between any of Bentley’s structural programs, as well as other popular BIM programs, via the Integrated Structural Model (ISM) technology. Each program can create and update an ISM repository, which can be shared with and opened by the others.

 

Q: Is there another way of importing STAAD to RAM Structural System other than ISM?

A: No, the mechanism for interoperating with each other is through ISM.

 

Q: When we import STAAD to RAM Structural System, are we importing model data only or is the load data included?

A: At this time only the model geometry data, including design sizes, is transferred through ISM.

 

Q: How do we go about validating the analysis results in STAAD.Pro or RAM Structural System?

A: Validation examples are available for both programs. The best way to verify any program is to create a simple model of something that you have already analyzed and designed and compare the program results with those results. It is always good practice with new software or new features to do some simple validation by hand to verify that the program is functioning correctly, and even more so that you are using it correctly.

 

Q: Can you please make a forum for limitations of RAM Structural System and STAAD?

A: Bentley Communities is an excellent source for information about RAM, STAAD, all of Bentley software. It has wikis, blogs and forums written by Bentley experts as well as Bentley software users. It is a great way to get answers to questions about the software.

http://communities.bentley.com/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/

 

 

RAM Structural System

Q: Does the software comply with the Canadian codes or any other internationally acceptable codes?

A: For steel member design, including composite beams, the requirements of AISC, Canada CAN/CSA S16, BS 5950, Eurocode and Australia AS 4100 have been implemented. For concrete member design the requirements of ACI, CAN/CSA A23.3, BS 8110, Eurocode, AS 3600, China GB50010, and Singapore CP 65 have been implemented. Except for CAN/CSA A23.3 these are also available for the design of concrete shear walls. Seismic design of steel frames is performed per the AISC seismic requirements. Wind forces can be generated per several codes including ASCE 7, NBC of Canada, BS 6399, China GB50011, and AS/NZS 1170.2, plus others. Seismic forces can be generated and response spectra analysis performed per several codes including ASCE 7, NBC of Canada, China GB50011, and AS/NZS 1170.4. Live Loads are reduced as permitted by IBC, NBC of Canada, BS 6399, Eurocode, AS/NZS 1170.1, China GB50009, and Hong Kong Building Code.

 

Q: Can we use RAM Structural System for high-rise buildings, say 50 stories?

A: Yes, RAM Structural System can be used for buildings of any height. The modeling accommodates tall structures very well with the way that the structure is modeled by floor layouts which can be used on multiple levels (e.g., a typical floor only needs to be modeled once and then used on any number of stories). Each such story is using the same layout, not copies of that layout. The analysis also accommodates tall buildings by utilizing both in-core and out-of-core solvers. It also can make use of multiple CPU’s.

 

Q: Can RAM Structural System perform response spectrum or time history analysis?

A: Response spectra analysis can be performed, but time history analysis is not currently available.

 

Q: Can we use RAM Structural System for performance base design?

A: Yes, to a degree. Neither nonlinear analysis nor time history analysis is available in the RAM Structural System.

 

Q: Can we use RAM Structural System to analyze progressive collapse or disproportionate collapse?

A: While the process of removing columns is not automated, this can be done by going into the RAM Modeler and removing individual columns and then analyzing the structure, repeating the process as necessary.

 

Q: Are there any plans in future of implementing Indian codes in RAM Structural System?

A: We have been doing extensive investigation of the requirements of the Indian concrete, steel, wind and seismic codes in preparation to implement them in the program.

 

Q: Is it possible to perform Finite Element Analysis using RAM Structural System?

A: The analysis used by the program to distribute floor loads to the supporting beams and columns, and the tracking of the loads through the gravity members is more sophisticated than Finite Element Analysis, allowing for very complex framing and surface-, line- and point loads. In the analysis of structures with shear walls and/or semirigid diaphragms the program automatically meshes the walls and diaphragms, and performs a Finite Element Analysis of the walls, diaphragms, and frames. If you need to perform a FEA on an object (such as a connection assembly), STAAD.Pro is more suitable for that type of modeling and analysis.

 

Q: Can RAM Structural System be used for Pre-Engineered Building Structure?

A: The program is often used for such buildings. However, the lack of an ability to analyze and design tapered beams and columns may limit its usefulness in some cases. In that case STAAD.Pro or RAM Elements might be more suitable.

 

Q: Can it be used for industrial structures like stacks or chimneys?

A: The RAM Structural System was developed for the analysis and design of buildings. While it is possible to use the program for other structures, STAAD.Pro would probably be more suitable for stacks and chimneys.

 

Q: Can we model hollow concrete column in RAM Structural System?

A: No, not currently. Square, rectangular and round columns can be modeled, analyzed and designed. There has also been some consideration of implementing L- and C-shaped concrete columns.

 

Q: Can we produce working drawings out of RAM Structural System?

A: An extensive set of drawings can be easily created, including floor plans, column and beam schedules, frame and wall elevations, foundation plans and foundation schedules. Furthermore, interoperability with BIM programs such as AECOsim Building Designer and Revit, and detailing programs such as ProStructure is also available. IFC files and CIS/2 files can also be created.

 

RAM Concept

Q: What is available for the design of concrete floor systems?

A: RAM Concept is for the analysis and design of one-way and two-way flat slabs/flat plates, with or without drop panels, and of one-way slab and beam floor systems. It is also excellent for the analysis and design of mat and raft foundations. More information on RAM Concept can be found here:

 

https://www.bentley.com/en/products/product-line/structural-analysis-software/ram-concept

 

RAM Structural System and RAM Concept can directly share information. RAM Structural System can export the slab geometry, material properties and loads to RAM Concept, and after the slab design is completed RAM Concept can export the column loads and moments, including the unbalanced moments, back to RAM Structural System for the design of the columns.

 

Q: Is post tension design available?

A: RAM Concept is capable of doing both post tensioned slabs and mild reinforced slabs. There are powerful tools to aid in the determination of the ideal tendon layout and in determining the impact and extent of long term deflection and floor vibration.

 

RAM Connection

Q: How do you design connections for truss members using RAM Connection?

RAM Connection can be run in three different modes: launched from STAAD, running a RAM Structural System database, and stand-alone. When run with STAAD or RAM the geometry, member sizes and loads are taken directly from the STAAD or RAM model. When run as stand-alone virtually any configuration of steel members and loads can be specified. Simple framing connections, moment- and braced frame connections, truss connections, and baseplates can be modeled and designed.

 

And finally…

Q: Is there a literature source for further learning?

A: For an in-depth discussion on stability analysis (P-delta, member imperfections, out-of-plumbness, etc.) AISC has recently published Design Guide 28: Stability Design of Steel Buildings. Some of this information can also be found in the AISC 14th Edition manual’s Commentary on Chapter C.

 

An excellent article on the Geometric Stiffness method of P-delta can be found in Chapter 11 of Static and Dynamic Analysis of Structures by Edward Wilson. The text for that chapter can be found by performing a web search on “Geometric Stiffness and P-delta Effects”.

 

A previous webinar addressed stability analysis in greater detail. The recording of that webinar can be found here:

 

http://pages.info.bentley.com/video-details/?video=CO_VID_RAMWEB_01_16&videoDBID=87cef95b-4d08-4dde-93ba-cf271ec0b2a7

 

Q: Is a trial version of the software available?

A: Trial versions of the software are not generally available unless you are already a Bentley client. Bentley clients can download, install and run virtually any other Bentley product, even if they have not purchased licenses for the other software. In that case the program will be run for a trial period of about 10 days, without any charge. Unfortunately there is no mechanism for allowing access to these trial use periods to those that don’t already have a Bentley account.

 

Q: Where can we access the video presentation for replay purposes?

A: The recording is available here:

 

http://pages.info.bentley.com/video-details/?video=CO_VID_WEB_RAMFRME_08_16&videoDBID=2875ae25-b3b3-498d-a565-e9ed48909388

 

Tags: question, RAM Structural System, accuracy, RAM, webinar

RAM Frame Elevation DXF Export crashes

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Seth Guthrie on 8/25/2016 6:12:28 PM

 Applies To 
 Product:Ram Frame 
First Affected Version:14.07.00.00
 Found in Version:14.07.00.00
Fixed in Version:15.03.00.00
 Area: Import/Export
 Issue #:278310

DXF Export crashes when adding a second frame

A single frame can be exported to DXF, but when a second frame is appended to the dxf output Ram Frame crashes (RAMContainer MFC Application has stopped working).

  

Reason

New defect #278310 in v14.07

Solution

Fixed in version 15.03.00.00. For older versions export each frame to a different DXF file, then copy and paste or XREF those various files into one file.

Tags: RAM Frame, DXF, RAM Structural System, known issue

Difference Between a Load Combination and a Repeat Load

$
0
0
Revision 4 posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Sye on 8/25/2016 8:16:21 PM

  
 Applies To 
  
 Product(s):STAAD.Pro
 Version(s):All
 Environment: N/A
 Area: General 
 Subarea: General FAQ
 Original Author:Bentley Technical Support Group
  

What is the difference between a LOAD COMBINATION and a REPEAT LOAD?

The difference lies in the way STAAD goes about calculating the results - joint displacements, member forces and support reactions. For a load combination case, STAAD simply ALGEBRAICALLY COMBINES THE RESULTS of the component cases after factoring them. In other words, for example, in order to obtain the results of load 10, it has no need to know what exactly constitutes load cases 3, 4 and 5. It just needs to know what the results of those cases are. Thus, the structure is NOT actually analysed for a combination load case. With a REPEAT LOAD case however, the procedure followed is that which occurs for any other primary load case. A load vector {P} is first created, and later, that load vector gets multiplied by the inverted stiffness matrix to compute the displacements. In other words the structure is analyzed for the combination of loads rather than just combining the results.

Tags: Difference between REPEAT LOAD and LOAD COMBINATION, REPEAT LOAD vs. LOAD COMBINATION, Load Combination, REPEAT LOAD

How to convert a LOAD COMB to a REPEAT LOAD

$
0
0
Revision 1 posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Sye on 8/25/2016 8:21:21 PM

Applies To
Product(s):STAAD.Pro
Version(s):ALL
Environment: ALL
Area: Modeling
Subarea:
Original Author:Sye Chakraborty, Bentley Technical Support Group

 

How to convert a LOAD COMB to a REPEAT LOAD

 

To begin with, the difference between LOAD COMBINATIONs and REPEAT LOADs are explained at the following wiki

 

http://communities.bentley.com/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/29299.difference-between-a-load-combination-and-a-repeat-load

 

A LOAD COMBINATION can be very easily converted to a REPEAT LOAD case using the STAAD.Pro command editor and making the simple syntax change as shown below

 

LOAD COMBINATION :

LOAD COMB 100 DL+LL

5 1.0 6 1.0

 

 

Equivalent REPEAT LOAD :

LOAD 100 DL+LL

REPEAT LOAD

5 1.0 6 1.0

Tags: convert load combination to REPEAT load, Load Combination, REPEAT LOAD

STAAD.Pro Modeling Solutions

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Sye on 8/25/2016 8:22:16 PM

  
 Applies To 
  
 Product(s):STAAD.Pro
 Version(s):All
 Environment: N/A
 Area: STAAD.Pro Modeling Solutions
 Subarea: Modeling
 Original Author:Bentley Technical Support Group
  

This page contains FAQs related to Modeling in STAAD.Pro.

Please use the tree structure on the left to browse to the individual FAQs ( wikis ).

  1. Section Properties not Entered for Member
  2. Analyzing Multiple Disjointed Structures
  3. Applying Line Loads on Plates
  4. Modeling a Retaining Wall
  5. Beam and Plate Orientation
  6. Compression Force in Tension Members
  7. Connectivity Issues
  8. Create Section by Specifying Profile Points
  9. Defining Temperature Load
  10. Fixed and Enforced Support
  11. Difference Between Plate, Shell, and Surface Elements
  12. Distributing Wheel Loads
  13. Total Joint/Element Limits Exceeded
  14. Steel Section Encased in Concrete or with Concrete Core
  15. Center of Gravity
  16. Model Solid Rods
  17. Modify Section Database
  18. New Section Database
  19. Convert "SET Z UP" to "SET Y UP"
  20. Define Cable Section
  21. Total Weight of Plates
  22. Modeling Corrugated Steel Plates
  23. Scale Down Supports
  24. Specify Values of Stiffness for Compression and Tension at a Support
  25. Edit Load Rules for Auto Load Combination Generation
  26. Joint Coordinates Modified when Model Moved
  27. Load Path Consideration
  28. Modeling & Designing Gusset Connection
  29. Model Shear Walls Using Plates
  30. Model Slab on Top of Beams
  31. Multiple Support Conditions in Same Model
  32. Cannot Copy a Member, Node or do Transitional Repeat
  33. Specify Seismic Weights Through Reference Load Cases
  34. Aspects to Consider Analyzing Mat Foundations
  35. Create Material Macro
  36. How to convert a LOAD COMBINATION to a REPEAT LOAD
Tags: connectivity, Temperature, orientation, Line Loads, transitional repeat, corrugated, rods, model moved, STAAD.Pro, Reference Load Cases, Surface, cable, Total Weight, Mat Foundations, Enforced, Gusset Connection, element limits, multiple support conditions, retaining wall, Modeling, Set Z Up, section database, center of gravity, Create Material, temperature load, wheel, SET Y UP, scale down supports, shell, Fixed, Disjointed, plate, joint limits, core, Section Properties, compression, Encased, load path, Shear Wall

Instability Warnings - PROBABLE CAUSE SINGULAR-ADDING WEAK SPRING

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Sye on 8/26/2016 12:32:47 AM

  
 Applies To 
  
 Product(s):STAAD.Pro
 Version(s):All
 Environment: N/A
 Area: Analysis
 Subarea: Instability and Zero Stiffness
 Original Author:Bentley Technical Support Group
  

I have analyzed a structure and find that there are instability messages in the .anl (output) file, as follows :

***WARNING - INSTABILITY AT JOINT 26 DIRECTION = FX 
PROBABLE CAUSE SINGULAR-ADDING WEAK SPRING 
K-MATRIX DIAG= 5.3274384E+03 L-MATRIX DIAG= 0.0000000E+00 EQN NO 127
***NOTE - VERY WEAK SPRING ADDED FOR STABILITY

**NOTE** STAAD DETECTS INSTABILITIES AS EXCESSIVE LOSS OF SIGNIFICANT DIGITS
DURING DECOMPOSITION. WHEN A DECOMPOSED DIAGONAL IS LESS THAN THE 
BUILT-IN REDUCTION FACTOR TIMES THE ORIGINAL STIFFNESS MATRIX DIAGONAL,
STAAD PRINTS A SINGULARITY NOTICE. THE BUILT-IN REDUCTION FACTOR 
IS 1.000E-09

THE ABOVE CONDITIONS COULD ALSO BE CAUSED BY VERY STIFF OR VERY WEAK 
ELEMENTS AS WELL AS TRUE SINGULARITIES.

What is the significance of such messages? 

An instability is a condition where a load applied on the structure is not able to make its way into the supports because no paths exist for the load to flow through, and may result in a lack of equilibrium between the applied load and the support reaction.

There is some explanation available in Section 1.18.1 of the STAAD.Pro Technical Reference Manual for the typical cause of instabilities. You will find it under the heading "Modeling and Numerical Instability Problems".

Tags: Instability, weak springs, zero stiffness

STAAD.Pro Miscellaneous [FAQ]

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Sye on 8/26/2016 5:22:00 PM

  
 Applies To 
  
 Product(s):STAAD.Pro
 Version(s):All
 Environment: N/A
 Area: Miscellaneous Topics
 Subarea: N/A
 Original Author:Bentley Technical Support Group
  
  1. Why does the program give some strange numbers when the joints are generated graphically by e.g. copying. We enter a number that has no decimals (7.00m) and in the input file the coordinate is 7.0001.
  2. When I use the Node Dimensioning Tool (Tools | Display Node to Node Dimension), how can I turn off just one dimension line rather than all of them with the Remove Node Dimension option?
  3. I am trying to model a beam connecting to the flange of a column instead of at the center. How is this modeled?
  4. How to model Pile cap attached to batter and vertical piles in STAAD.Pro?
  5. In the new 3D rendered window, how can I view the structure in plan, elevation and isometric view like I can with the other windows? Also, how do I pan across the model?
  6. When I save a file from the STAAD.Pro GUI, the joint coordinate data and member incidence data are written into the .std file in such a manner that there are several entries per line, separated by semi-colons. I would like it to be written in a way that the joint coordinate data is written as one joint per line and the member incidence data is written as one member per line. Is there some setting in the program to facilitate this?
  7. Can you please tell me how to transfer data from EXCEL to STAAD-PRO?
  8. How do I graphically display the distance between two nodes?
  9. I have a rather large frame building consisting of several floors. I want to look at individual floors by themselves without the rest of the structure cluttering up the view. Can you tell me how to do that?
  10. How do I access online help in STAAD.Pro? The F1 key does not bring up any help screens.
  11. How can I convert single line input to multiple line input? The program currently converts my joint coordinate and member incidence data from multiple line to single line input.
  12. Plate Error - Badly Shaped, Warped, Not Convex, or Not Numbered Counter-Clockwise

See Also

Product TechNotes and FAQs

Structural Product TechNotes And FAQs

External Link

Bentley Technical Support KnowledgeBase

Bentley LEARN Server

Comments or Corrections?

Bentley's Technical Support Group requests that you please confine any comments you have on this Wiki entry to this "Comments or Corrections?" section. THANK YOU!

 

   

Tags: FAQs, SELECTservices, STAAD.Pro Error Report, STAAD.Pro, Error Report

Base Shear Does Not Match the Summation of Shears

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Kris Sathia on 8/29/2016 8:21:53 AM

  
 Applies To 
  
 Product(s):STAAD.Pro
 Version(s):All
 Environment: N/A
 Area: Analysis
 Subarea: Response Spectrum Analysis
 Original Author:Bentley Technical Support Group
  

In a response spectrum analysis, the base shear does not match the summation of shears I get at the base of the columns. Which one should I use as base shear ?
Related query : In a response spectrum analysis, summation of the support reactions does not match the base shear reported. Which one should I use as base shear ?

The one that the software reports as the base shear, is the correct value to use. The column shears ( or support reactions ) reported are all individual maximums and may not occur at the same instant of time. There is a high probability that at the instant when the base shear is maximum, some of the column shears ( or support reactions ) will be less than their individual peak values. Moreover the method used for modal combination, gets rid of signs and hence column shears ( support reactions ) like any other response spectrum output, would be devoid of any sign. Hence one cannot add these up to arrive at the base shear.

There is some useful information on this topic in Section 5.1.10 of this book from the Bentley Press

store.bentley.com/.../WAD00908A10001--Principles-of-Structural-Analysis

Tags: summation of shears, base shear

Newly added section shows up at the end

$
0
0
Revision 1 posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Sye on 8/29/2016 5:39:28 PM

I am adding a new section to Limcon but the section shows up at the end of the list. Is it possible to make it appear at the top ?

 

Within Limcon, new sections can be added via GUI. Behind the scenes that gets converted to a Libraryname.asc file before it is compiled into Libraryname.lib, which resides in C:\ProgramData\Bentley\Engineering\Limcon\Lib.

 

After adding a new section, you may go to  File > Configure > Edit Library Source file.

 

New sections are added as one line at the bottom of the each section category within the ASC file. If you cut and paste this line to the top, then close, you will be asked “if you want to compile library”, click  yes; The newly added section will then appear at the top within Limcon.

Note that “$” signal a comment within ASC file.

 

For example: Newly added section ABC is showing up at the top as seen in the picture below

Tags: add section, section, Database, Limcon

Cannot do Pushover Analysis on a concrete structure using STAAD.Pro

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Sye on 8/29/2016 11:08:23 PM

Applies To
Product(s):STAAD.Pro
Version(s):ALL
Environment: ALL
Area: Analysis
Subarea: Pushover Analysis
Original Author:Sye Chakraborty, Bentley Technical Support Group

 

I have a concrete structure. I am attempting to do a Pushover Analysis and getting errors. I cannot figure out why.

 

As of now, Pushover Analysis in STAAD.Pro is restricted to steel structures only. If you attempt to do a pushover analysis on a concrete structure, the software would generate the following error in the analysis output file

 

   **ERROR : ONLY MATERIAL STEEL IS CONSIDERED FOR PUSHOVER ANALYSIS.

Tags: pushover, progressive collapse, pushover analysis on concrete structure

Pushover Analysis

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Sye on 8/29/2016 11:09:12 PM

  
 Applies To 
  
 Product(s):STAAD.Pro
 Version(s):All
 Environment: N/A
 Area: Pushover Analysis
 Subarea: N/A
 Original Author:Bentley Technical Support Group
  

This page contains wikis related to Pushover Analysis.  

  1. Does STAAD.Pro Pushover analysis check beams for axial plus bending interaction ?
  2. Does STAAD.Pro Pushover analysis consider both moment and axial hinges ?
  3. Cannot do Pushover Analysis on a concrete structure using STAAD.Pro

You may also browse the tree structure on the left to access the wikis on this and other topics.

Tags: pushover analysis

Block Shear Net Tension Area on Angles

$
0
0
Revision 10 posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Seth Guthrie on 9/7/2016 8:02:46 PM

Applies To
 Product:LIMCON
First Affected Version:03.63.01.11
 Found in Version:03.63.01.14
Fixed in Version:03.63.01.21
 Environment: All
 Area: Design
 Issue Number:186913

Problem Description

Block shear calculations on angles uses an incorrect tension area.

Reason

Limcon's detail diagrams show bolt holes as if they were centrally placed about the centerline of the angle leg, rather than being located according to AISC standard gage recommendations. When calculating the net tension area the edge distance Limcon approximates this by assuming that bolt group is centered on the angle leg less the angle thickness. For a 4" x 1/2" angle with 1" bolts this means Limcon is assuming a tension length of 1.25" instead of 1".

Solution

The block shear calculation is being corrected to be more exact in release 3.63.01.21. Update to that build or hand check the block shear on angles when critical to the design.

Tags: design, bock shear, known issue, connection, Limcon

STAAD(X) Tower

$
0
0
Revision 15 posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Jason Coleman on 9/7/2016 9:31:34 PM

Design Software for Communication Towers

STAAD(X) Tower performs comprehensive design and analysis of various types of communication structures such as tapered monopoles, stepped poles, 3-legged or 4-legged self-supporting and guyed towers. STAAD(X) Tower helps engineers to generate the physical model using parametric setup wizards and categorizes the panels/sections, legs, horizontals, and bracing members with orientations without manual intervention. The structure can easily be edited to achieve the desired shape and configuration.

Visit the STAAD(X) Tower Product Page for additional information on this product.

ISM Enabled STAAD(X) Tower is ISM Enabled.

LEARN

View STAAD(X) Tower learning paths on Bentley's LEARNserver.

Download

You can download the latest version of STAAD(X) Tower from Bentley's Fulfillment Center.

STAAD(X) Tower is available under a Structural Enterprise License. Learn more.

Support

Visit [[STAAD(X) Tower TechNotes and FAQs]]

Related

Browse related content tagged: STAAD(X) Tower

STAAD(X) Tower TechNotes and FAQ's

[[STAAD(X)]], [[STAAD.Pro]], [[MStower]]

Tags: communications tower, STAAD(X) Tower, tower design

What's New in STAAD.Pro V8i SS6, Build 20.07.11.82 ( 12 July 2016)

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Carlos Aguera on 9/8/2016 11:49:29 AM

What's New in STAAD.Pro V8i SS6, Build 20.07.11.82 ( 12 July 2016)

Issues addressed in:-


(A) Issues addressed in the Analysis/Design engine (48)

A) 01 The AISC 360-10 design check has been updated to correct the flexural torsional buckling stress, Fcr, that is calculated for double angle profiles when Iyy<izz. this is due to a recent modification that failed to check for the occation when iyy>Izz and thus the major and minor axes were not correctly identified.

A) 02 The design routine for IS:800-2007 has been updated to include a warning in the output file if a MEMBER SELECTION command is included, but is not followed by a suitable analysis command to update the forces based on the new section profiles.

A) 03 The design routine for CSA S16-14 has been updated to include a warning in the output file if a MEMBER SELECTION command is included, but is not followed by a suitable analysis command to update the forces based on the new section profiles.

A) 04 The design routine for AISC 360 has been updated to include a warning in the output file if a MEMBER SELECTION command is included, but is not followed by a suitable analysis command to update the forces based on the new section profiles.

A) 05 Clause 8.6.1 of IS:800-2007 has been added to check that the minimum web dimension is met and a warning is displayed if d/tw less than the value specified.

A) 06 The AISC 360 design routines have been updated to ensure that profiles defined as solid rods are excluded from the code checks

A) 07 The calculation for clause 9.3.1.2(b) in IS:800-2007 has been updated for welded profiles. As this is not 100% clear in the code, the following method has been adopted, if n>=a then Mndy = minimum of ( Mdy[1-{(n-a)/(1-a)}^2] and Mndy ). Previously if the axial load was zero, this would have resulted in Mndy as 0 and reported as infinity in the output.

A) 08 The AISC 360-10 routines for designing tubular sections taken from a standard table have been updated to use the following for the shear area:- Ayy = (D-3t)*t and Azz = (B-3t)*t. Note that this was correctly defined for tubular sections taken from a user table.

A) 09 The stresses reported for solid entities (both corner and centre stresses) have been corrected from a fix for addressing stresses for response spectrum cases which has resulted in the incorrect value of Poissons ratio was being used.

A) 10 The imperfection analysis routines have been updated to include both the moment and shear effects of the camber defined on members. However, whilst the moments were being considered, the shear was not. This has been corrected.

A) 11 The Russian steel design codes SNiP and SP16 have been updated to ensure that only the following profiles can be designed, wide flange, single channel, circular and rectangular hollow sections, tee, single and double channels. Any other profile is currently not supported. A warning message is now displayed when attempting to design one of these profiles.

A) 12 The deflection check routine used in AISC 360, IS:800-2007 and CSA S16 has been updated to correct a failure resulting in the CAN parameter not being checked (i.e. for cantilever members). Additionally, in the check for AISC 360 when the critical condition is deflection, then the forces were not being extracted and being displayed as 0.0.

A) 13 The routine to determine wind loads on open structures has been updated to correct the loading calculated on members that are not parallel to the direction in which the wind is being applied.

A) 14 The AISC 360 design routines have been updated to support the design of double channels which are aligned front to front, i.e. with the flanges of the channels pointing towards each other and touching. These sections are treated as a box section.

A) 15 The AISC 360 design routine has been updated to correct a spurious message that was being reported if the model included an ENVELOPE TYPE STRENGTH, but there is no DFF parameter. The message reported that the deflection check would not be performed as the DFF parameter had not been defined, even though no deflection check was requested.

A) 16 The IBC 2012 routine to determine the S1 and SS values has been updated to ensure that the correct values are determined when extrapolating between published values.

A) 17 The DIRECT ANALYSIS routine has been updated to support multiple response spectrum cases.

A) 18 The deflection check routines in the AISC 360, IS:800-2007 and CSA S16 design codes have been updated to report the correct load case. Previously the report would indicate the case to be the last case in the list rather than the critical case, however, the value was correct.

A) 19 The default value for the proximity of duplicate nodes created with the MESH command has been reduced from 0.1 in to 0.03937 into match the default tolerance in the GUI. Additionally, if the value has been changed using the SET MESH TOLERANCE and this does not match the value in the UI, then a warning message will be displayed.

A) 20 The Russian steel design codes now correctly design HSS sections as circular or rectangular hollow sections. Previously these were being designed as wide flange sections.

A) 21 The Japanese steel design codes AIJ 2002 and 2005 have been updated to remove a modification added in STAAD.Pro V8i SS5 (20.07.11.41) to address equation 6.4

A) 22 The analysis engine has been updated to address an issue where a primary load case includes self-weight and that load case is later referenced in a second case using a REPEAT command, then the effect of the self weight on the section axial forces was not being included.

A) 23 The IS:13920 concrete column design has been updated to calculate the space between two parallel legs of rectangular hoop acting as confining reinforcement. Previously this led to the failure of providing confining reinforcement. Now, the program calculates the space between two parallel legs of rectangular hoop acting as confining reinforcement so that it does not exceed 300 mm. If it exceeds 300 mm it introduces cross ties and additional longitudinal reinforcement (if required).

A) 24 The sign of the shear force reported in the output file for designs to IS:800-2007 have been updated to be consistent with the signs reported elsewhere in the program.

A) 25 The output for the Russian SNiP steel design has been updated when displaying the details of clause 5.31, the values of BETA is now formatted so that its value is clearer. The design itself has not changed.

A) 26 The Indian steel design IS:800-2007 has been updated for clause 9.2.2. Now the bending capacity for laterally supported members with high shear (i.e. V>0.6 Vd) will be calculated according to sec.9.2.2(b). Note that if the section is semi-compact, Mdv = Ze * fy / Gamma_0, where Ze = effective elastic section modulus considering the shear buckling case according to sec.8.2.1.1(a).

A) 27 The AISC 360 steel design codes have been updated to ensure that if the parameter STP is specified with a value of 2, i.e. consider the profile as a welded section, then the larger web length is considered (i.e. without the rolling radius).

A) 28 The output for a response spectrum case has been updated to ensure that the details of the modal acceleration is reported correctly.

A) 29 The processing of the Canadian seismic code with SCL 6 (i.e. site class F), has been updated, such that if this is specified, the values of Fa and Fv are used. In fact if Fa and/or Fv are entered, then these are used rather than those determined from the value of the site class.

A) 30 The deflection check routine for the Canadian steel design code CSA S16-14 has been updated to ensure that the results are correctly converted to the metric unit system and this is enforced by including the units which are MM.

A) 31 The details of floor panels that have been loaded with a FLOOR LOAD command are now included in the output file. This makes it easier to verify that the areas being loaded by the engine match those as indicated by the graphics in the GUI.

A) 32 The analysis engine has been updated to address an issue when a primary load case contains a REPEAT LOAD that incudes reference to a load case which itself has a reference to a NOTIONAL LOAD. If the primary case also includes a reference to a NOTIONAL LOAD, processing of this would cause the analysis to crash.

A) 33 The AISC 360 steel design routines have been updated for processing the serviceability checks. If a deflection check is specified by including an envelope of type serviceability, but DFF has not been set, a warning will now be displayed in the output file to indicate the missing parameter.

A) 34 The Indian steel design routine IS:800-2007 has been updated when calculating the member strength to clause 9.3.1.1 when in tension. The value of Td is used in determining Nd when in tension. Note that when in compression, Nd = Ag*fy/Gamma_m0.

A) 35 The Indian concrete design outputs for both IS:456-2000 and IS:13920 have been updated to include a header which includes details of the name of the code used in the design and the method of design followed, e.g. Limit State.

A) 36 The analysis routines have been updated when processing ENVELOPE definitions such that if any load case is included as both a Strength AND a Serviceability envelope, then a warning message. Any load case that is included in both types will be used in the first type that it is defined with.

A) 37 The deflection check performed for the AISC 360 design codes when set to metric units has been updated to ensure the report displays the values in metric units.

A) 38 The steel design code routines for AISC 360, IS:800-2007 and CSA S16 have been updated to catch a situation where a CHECK CODE or SELECT command line includes a member reference multiple times. The second instance of the same member number would cause the program to fail and only partially report the design for the second and subsequent references.

A) 39 The steel design codes AISC 360, IS:800-2007 and CSA S16 have been updated to report errors if the design is set to use PMEMBER references instead of MEMBER. Currently these codes only support the design of analytical members, not physical members.

A) 40 The SABS:0100 concrete design routine has been corrected to address an issue where the moments being used were not being used in the correct sense and resulting in an incorrect area of reinforcement being reported.

A) 41 As per cl. 4.4.2 of IS800:2007, if the moment amplification factor (Ky, Kz calculated as per cl.9.3.2.2) is more than 1.4, a second order elastic analysis is required. This has been added to the IS:800-2007 design routine such that if this is identified then a warning is displayed advising the use of a second order analysis.

A) 42 The IBC 2006 routine has been updated to ensure that Lower Cs limit is greater than that specified in eqn 12.8-5 which previously was not being done.

A) 43 IS:800-2007 LSD and WSD codes have been updated to include a provision to check against flexural-torsional buckling according to clause 7.5.1.2. This check is included for single angle section profiles and the member is axially loaded through one of its legs which thus results in an additional moment due to the eccentricity of the leg from the centroid. Additional parameters for the codes to cover this condition are ANG, FXTY and NBL. Refer to the International Design Codes manual for more details on the default values and correct use of these parameters.

A) 44 The IS:800-2007 design routine has been corrected to address a problem that occurred for the design of a collection of members that referenced multiple user defined PIPE sections. The members that had been assigned with the second or any subsequent defined profile were being designed with the first assigned user defined profile. Note that the details of the section properties that were being used would be reported in the output file. However, this was not a problem if the user pipes were defined in a UPT.

A) 45 The Russian steel design code SP16.13330 has been updated to ensure that when checking clause 8.2.1(44) for combined bending and shear, if the ratio of this check exceeds unity, then the status is shown as a failure. Whilst the ratio would be shown correctly, if this was the only clause to exceed unity, then the overall status would still show as a pass, even though the failure ratio is shown as greater than one.

A) 46 The IS:800-2007 design routines for wide flange sections with slender flanges has been updated. Due to the restrictions in the code for the design of these sections, they will only be designed for axial forces. If there are any moment forces detected, they are now reported as a failure in the design.

A) 47 The IBC 2006 (ASCE 7-2005) seismic loading routine has been updated such that if a used value of CT is entered, then that value is reported as entered (and not modified to the current unit system). Note that this is used in calculating the approximate fundamental period Ta as per eqn 12.8-7 in clause 12.8.2.1 of ASCE 07-2005, which uses the difference between maximum and minimum values of Y ordinate in the model (in feet) to determine 'hn'.

Additionally, if either of the parameters CT or K (which equates to the terms 'Ct' and 'x' in eqn 12.8-7) are not included in the IBC definition, then their values are calculated based on a determination of the Young's Modulus of all the members in the model. The value is calculated as the sum of all the Young's Modulus for all the members in the model divided by the number of members in the model. If this value < 4,000 ksi, then the model is assumed to be 'Concrete moment-resisting frame' and the missing values of 'Ct' and/or 'x' are taken as 0.016 and 0.9 respectively. If this value is > 10,000 ksi, then the model is assumed to be a 'Steel moment-resisting frame' and the missing values of 'Ct' and/or 'x' are taken as 0.028 and 0.8 respectively. If this value is between 4,000 and 10,000 ksi, then the model is assumed to be 'All other structural systems' and the missing values of 'Ct' and 'x' are taken as 0.02 and 0.75 respectively. Note that previously, if the parameter K was not entered, the value of 'x' was simply taken as 0.75.

A) 48 The Indian steel design code has been updated to ensure that if any member is clasified as slender and also has any moment force (other than a wide flange member with a slender web), then this is reported as a FAIL. This is because the code is restricted to only support axially loaded slender members and there is no provision for determining a bending capacity except for wide flange members with slender webs. Previously only the details of the axial checks were reported and as such could be reported as a PASS.

Top


(B) Issues addressed in the Pre-Processing Mode (13)

B) 01 The display of the parameter LAT for the IS:800-2007 LSD and WSD codes has been updated to clarify that the two options are in reference to clause 8.2.2 and 8.2.1 respectively.

B) 02 The Indian Profiles (legacy) database has been updated to remove an unnecessary table called 'ConversionErrors'

B) 03 An additional check has been included in the tool Geometry>Intersect Selected Members>Highlight such that an intersection point will be included in the members connect at the end of one of the members.

B) 04 The GUI has been updated to recognise the command IGNORE ELEMENT which previously was reporting as an error. However, note that if the file is saved, then the command will be changed to IGNORE MEMBER. Note that both terms are interchangeable even for plates.

B) 05 The processing of COMBINATION commands has been updated to ensure that if the combination refers to non-existent load cases, then when the file is opened, then a warning is displayed with details of the non-existent load cases and when the file re-saved, they are removed from the combination.

B) 06 The AISC 14.1 database has been updated to be consistent with the published profiles from the AISC and the profiles previously included in the TUBE table have been removed. Note they are maintained in the AISC Legacy database and if needed, this database can be used for the US profiles by selecting this in Configurations>Sections on the Start Screen.

B) 07 The GUI has been updated to recognise a REPEAT load case which refers to load cases that do not currently exist, but will be created during the analysis in a response spectrum load case that includes the option IMR. Previously if the REPEAT case referred to such cases, then those cases would be seen as non-existent and removed when the file is resaved.

B) 08 The member query window has been updated to correctly display the reference of a double angle, either long leg LD or short leg SD or in star formation SA. This was being displayed with the LD, SD or SA parameter twice.

B) 09 The member query dialog has been updated to use the following in determining the shear areas of wide flange sections that have additional cover plates:- AY = (D+Tp1+Tp2)*Tw and AZ = 2/3 * (2*Bf*Tf + Bp1*Tp1 + Bp2*Tp2).

B) 10 The GUI save routine has been updated to ensure that when an IBC seismic definition includes a ZIP code, if there are preceding 0s, these are maintained and not stripped off which would cause a problem when the command line is processed.

B) 11 The GUI has been updated to improve processing of physical members when merging beams. Previously, if a beam was associated with a physical member, then merging that beam with another, deleted the physical member with which it was associated. Now with the current implementation, the physical member is not deleted but the beam is removed from included beam list.

B) 12 The GUI has been updated to improve the handling of the windows control of the Editor if the choice to switch from the current to legacy versions is made during the session. As the control of the Editor is handled as a parallel process, there were instances when switching from one to the other would prevent the Editor from starting without restarting the application. This has now been addressed.

B) 13 The 3D rendering routines have been updated in the GUI to handle the event of attempting to draw a poorly defined curve member. Previously this would have cause the program to crash, but now a warning message is displayed.

Top


(C) Issued Addressed in the Post-Processing Mode (02)

C) 01 The 3D Beam Stress Contour dialog in the Post Processing>Beam>Stresses page has been updated to improve the cross section which will now maintain the correct aspect ratio even when the window is resized. Also the corner stresses are displayed as default and use the format defined in the View>Options>Force Units for the Stress unit, including the number of decimal places.

C) 02 The IS:800-2007 design routine has been updated in order to ensure that the details of a serviceability check reported in the Member Query reflects the design status. Although the ratio was correct, if the ratio exceeded unity, the status would still display this as a Pass. Note that the correct status was reported in the output file.

Top


(D) Issues Addressed in the Steel Design Mode (00)

(None)

Top


(E) Issues Addressed in the Concrete Design Mode (00)

(None)

Top


(F) Issues Addressed in the RAM Connection Mode (31)

F) 01 The British baseplate design has been updated to support CHS sections.

F) 02 The RAM Connection mode has been updated so that it now supports taper members designed with a Moment End Plate (MEP).

F) 03 The display of bolts in the RAM Connection module has been updated to ensure that the radius of the bolt does not use the value of the bolt diameter.

F) 04 The RAM Connection routines have been updated such that when applying multiple connections, the error lists and data repository is cleared to ensure that new designs do not cause the application to crash.

F) 05 The export RAM Connection report routine has been updated to ensure that if the selection does not include any items, then creating a report does not cause the application to crash.

F) 06 The AISC>Bolt database has been updated to include washer thicknesses for all bolts.

F) 07 The AISC>Bolt database has been updated to include Nut Height values.

F) 08 The UK>Bolt database has been updated to remove the redundant ReadOnly column.

F) 09 The UK>Bolt database has been updated to include Nut Height values.

F) 10 The UK>Bolt database has been updated to include Washer Thicknesses for all entries. Previously some entries had a value of 'TRUE'

F) 11 The Europe>Bolt database has been updated to remove the redundant ReadOnly column.

F) 12 The Europe>Bolt database has been updated to include Nut Height for all entries. Previously some entries had a value of 'TRUE'

F) 13 The Chinese>Bolt database has been updated to remove the redundant ReadOnly column.

F) 14 The Chinese>Bolt database has been updated to include Nut Height for all entries. Previously some entries had a value of 'TRUE'

F) 15 The design of CBB gusset connections with WT brace members has been corrected to ensure that the correct area of the brace is utilised.

F) 16 The VXB connection design has been corrected and ensures that the analysis forces are included, which previously simply showed as zero.

F) 17 The export RAM Connection routine has been updated to ensure that where there are multiple connections defined at a node, both connection details are reported. Previously, the first connection would be reported a second time instead of the second connection.

F) 18 The internal method used to assign a connection to a joint has been updated to prevent assignment of failed connections. If these failed connections were included in a report, this would cause the application to crash.

F) 19 The processing of load envelopes in the RAM Connection mode has been updated to account for changes to the selected range of loads after connections have already been defined which previously caused the program to crash.

F) 20 The RAM Connection module has been updated to support members that have profiles defined with spaces in the profile name. Whilst STAAD.Pro does not support spaces in the middle of the name there were a number of standard profiles that had a space at the end of their name which caused the program to crash when used with a RAM Connection joint.

F) 21 RAM Connection module currently included with STAAD.Pro is unable to process connections created with the older version of RAM Connection which was included in STAAD.Pro V8i SS6 20.07.11.50 and earlier. In build 20.07.11.70, this would result in the program hanging and requires STAAD.Pro to be forcibly shut down. Now a warning message is displayed confirming that the connections will be removed. If the old connections are wanted, the *.rsc and *.rcc files in the model folder should be manually copied first.

F) 22 The processing of loads in the RAM Connection module has been updated to ensure that if the model changes and an existing set of connections are re-checked, then the loads are reprocessed.

F) 23 When entering the RAM Connection mode without using a full license, the warning message that is displayed now gives a clearer explanation as to the cause and action that can be taken.

F) 24 The RAM Connection input dialog has been reformatted to be more in keeping with other dialog boxes found in STAAD.Pro.

F) 25 The processing of materials included in the STAAD model when entering the RAM Connection mode has been updated to give a clearer status on their status.

F) 26 The Basic Connection templates have been updated to improve the reference of angle profiles used in the templates which previously may have used sections other than those listed in the title.

F) 27 The RAM Connection Report Export has been updated to ensure that the details of Ratio and Status are updated when the connection designs have been updated.

F) 28 The RAM Connection module has been updated to address an issue which would occur if attempting to design multiple connections and one of the connections returns the status as 'Not Designed', if this connection was opened, then this would result in the application crashing.

F) 29 The routine to select joints has been updated. It is possible to select a connection in the graphics window, then use the menu option Select>Select Connections>Select Identical Connections. This was previously causing the program to crash.

F) 30 The RAM Connection Results sheet has been updated to ensure that the Status field correctly reflects the design status. Previously, a design which had a ratio < =1.0 would display as 'No Good' and if the ratio > 1.0, then it would display 'Pass'. Now the correct logic has been applied.

F) 31 The RAM Connection baseplate design has been updated to ensure that the details of the anchors are defined in the correct units.

Top


(G) Issues Addressed in the Advanced Slab Design Mode (00)

(None)

Top


(H) Issues Addressed in the Piping Mode (00)

(None)

Top


(I) Issues Addressed in the Editor, Viewer and other modules (01)

I) 01 The STAAD.Pro ISM module (StructLink) has been updated to ensure that if there is a missing profile in the mapping, once it is set , the same mapping is used for all members with that property. Previously, if there had been multiple members with that property, the same mapping would have to be made multiple times.

Top


(J) Issues Addressed in OpenSTAAD (01)

J) 01 The OpenSTAAD example in an MS Word document has been updated to use the current OpenSTAAD Application object.

Top


(K) Issues Addressed with Documentation and Printing (03)

K) 01 The OpenSTAAD documentation for the function Property > Property.GetElementMaterialName has been updated to correct that the parameter PlateNo should be defined as a long integer and not a string.

K) 02 The section on Troubleshooting> ActiveX Component in MS Excel in the OpenSTAAD documentation has been updated to clarify issues that might occur when attempting to register the OpenSTAAD component.

K) 03 The documentation of TIME HISTORY loading has been updated in section 5.32.10.2 to confirm that a type ACCELERATION is used for GROUND MOTION and type FORCE or MOMENT is for assignment to nodes.

Top


(L) Issues Addressed with licensing / security / installation (02)

L) 01 Usage of design codes is now activated by the creating commands and processing results.

L) 02 The installation has been updated with the preview images of the models in the STAAD\EXAMP\Advanced Cable Analysis folder.

I have a node-lock license for STAAD.Pro. Can I use STAAD.foundation too?

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Payel on 9/8/2016 10:38:54 PM

Applies To
Product(s):STAAD.Pro
Version(s):Select Series 4 and later
Environment: ALL
Area: STAAD.Pro Installation/Licensing Solutions
Subarea: Licensing
Original Author:Payel Sasmal, Bentley Technical Support Group

Problem Description:

I have recently moved to node-locked license, I own a license for STAAD.Pro and a design code. Can I use STAAD.foundation too? I see it is included in the installation package, but I do not see STAAD.foundation in the available license list

Solution:

If you are entitled to install STAAD.Pro Select Series 4 (20.07.09.xx) and later version; you can install STAAD.foundation too. You can use it from the tab 'Foundation Design' or from the drop-down Menu under 'Mode'. This is initially greyed out, this becomes active once you have analyzed the file.

 P.S. You will not be able to use STAAD.foundation as a stand-alone module; you must use it from STAAD.Pro.

Tags: node-locked license, STAAD.Foundation license, STAAD.foundation

RAM SS - CONNECT Version 15.03 Issues

$
0
0
Revision 1 posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Karl G on 9/9/2016 8:37:52 PM

Under Construction

Tags: RAM Structural System, index, known issue, Support Solutions, version 15.3

Incorrect Building Story Shear and Frame Story Shear Results for Dynamic Load Cases

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Karl G on 9/9/2016 8:47:23 PM

 Applies To 
 Product:RAM Frame Analysis
First Affected Version:15.03.00.00
 Found in Version:15.03.00.00
Fixed in Version:
 Area: Analysis
 Issue #:537872

Problem Description

Incorrect Building Story Shear and Frame Story Shears are reported when dynamic load cases are analyzed with gravity load cases only. Correct results are obtained when only dynamic load cases are analyzed or when the dynamic loads are analyzed with both gravity and static seismic load cases. The issue affects models with semirigid diaphragms and two-way decks.

Reason

The program is not processing results for gravity columns and walls correctly.

Solution

The issue will be resolved in the release after v15.03.00. In the meantime, analyze dynamic load cases with gravity load cases and static seismic load cases.

Tags: RAM Frame, RAM Structural System, dynamic, story shear, known issue

Known Issues in Ram Structural System

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to RAM | STAAD Wiki by Karl G on 9/9/2016 8:56:31 PM

RAM SS - CONNECT Version 15.03 Issues

[[RAM SS - CONNECT Version 15.02 Issues]]

[[RAM SS CONNECT - Version 15.00 Issues]]

[[RAM SS V8i - Version 14.07 Issues]]

[[RAM SS V8i - Version 14.06 and earlier issues]]

Tags: RAM Structural System, index, known issue
Viewing all 8748 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>