Quantcast
Channel: RAM | STAAD | ADINA Wiki
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8748

Is the reduction in stiffness applied when a response spectrum load case is subjected to DIRECT ANALYSIS

$
0
0
Current Revision posted to Structural Analysis and Design - Wiki by Sye on 6/19/2015 1:12:17 AM

Applies To
Product(s):STAAD.Pro
Version(s):ALL
Environment: ALL
Area: Analysis
Subarea: Direct Analysis
Original Author:Sye Chakraborty, Bentley Technical Support Group

 

When a response spectrum load case is subjected to a DIRECT ANLYSIS, does the software apply the reduction in stiffness like 0.8EA and 0.8*Tau*EI as is required for a DIRECT ANALYSIS ?

 

Yes the software does apply the 0.8 reduction factor to the area ( A ) and Moment of Inertia ( Ix, Iy and Iz ) but it cannot account for Tau as for that the software needs to know the nature of the axial force which is not possible for a response spectrum analysis because the forces are devoid of any signs. Moreover it would not make sense to apply the Tau-b anyway because the member forces in the various members from a response spectrum analysis are not forces that occur at the same time instant.

 

It may be worth noting here that one cannot satisfy ALL the requirements of a Direct analysis for a response spectrum load case. The reasons are explained in detail in the following wiki article   

 

http://communities.bentley.com/products/structural/structural_analysis___design/w/structural_analysis_and_design__wiki/21018.response-spectrum-loading-in-direct-analysis

Tags: direct analysis and response spectrum, 0.8Tau-b EI, direct analysis with response spectrum, direct analysis, 0.8EA, Response Spectrum, reduction in stiffness

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 8748

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>